فهم فلسفی و تاریخی اندیشه سیاسی بر اساس تلفیقی از نظرات اسکینر، اکشات، و اسپریگنز

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

• منابع۱- Barry, B., Political Argument, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, ...
• Dembski, W., “The Fallacy of Contextualism,” in The Princeton Theological ...
• Femia, J., “An Historicist Critique of Revisionist Methods for Studying ...
• Jordan, S. and C. Nederman, “Between Sartori and Skinner: Methodological ...
• Kos, E. “The Text and Context in Oakeshott’s Political Philosophy” ...
• Lively, J. and A. Reeve, “General Introduction” in J. Lively ...
• Mandell, D., “The History of Political Thought as a Vocation: ...
• Oakeshott, M., Morality and Politics in Modern Europe, London: Yale ...
• Palonen, K., Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric,Oxford: Polity Press, ۲۰۰۳ ...
• Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, Vol. ۱, Cambridge: Cambridge University ...
• Skinner, Q., et al. “Political Philosophy: the View from Cambridge” ...
• Spragens, Th., Understanding Political Theory,New York: St. Martins Press, ۱۹۷۶ ...
• Stevenson, L., “Contextualism” in T. Honderich (ed.), The Oxford Companion ...
• Strauss, Leo, “Political Philosophy and History” in Journal of the ...
• Tuck, R. “The Contribution of History” in R. Goodin and ...
• Vincent, A., “Introduction”in A. Vincent (ed.), Political Theory: Tradition and ...
• Zuckert, M., Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy, Kansas: University ...
نمایش کامل مراجع